[anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database
firstname.lastname@example.org world.antispam.report at inbox.com
Tue Aug 9 19:54:37 CEST 2011
Nial & me tested "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com" which as well mentioned on the RIPE webpage you mentioned on your 1st thread. In any events, an abuse@ given to RIPE authority by an allocated network should be working for any IP# on planet earth. Then you come up with security.tiws? I get the same reply:550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>: Recipient address rejected. This time, that IP# isn't located in Miami USA but rather in Buenos Aires, Bresil. South America. A heck of a nice little walk from where you are. No mistake there, the language over there is Portuguese and not Spanish. Beside, any idea of the distance between those 2 cities? Still, as of now, i didn't seen any threat related to the lack of replies from these peoples? They may be busy fighthing something? Or simply reconfigurating their things with "Trial" IP# ? They seem to establish networks worlwide... Maybe they're using IP# normally under RIPE authority but they'll be back! Who knows? Why would one be so severe? ================================= Resolving smtpar.telefonica.com...] [Contacting smtpar.telefonica.com [18.104.22.168]...] [Connected] 220 ESMTP IMSVA EHLO Network-Tools.com 250-artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 20971520 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN VRFY security.tiws 550 5.1.1 <security.tiws>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table RSET ============================ > -----Original Message----- > From: info at webservice.be > Sent: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:07:30 +0200 > To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Correct info in RIPE-database > > > The emailadress I contacted was the one where they mention the AS-number > remarks: Any Notification about AS12956 security please e-mail to : > remarks: security.tiws at telefonica.com > > > > I got a bounce from it: > > Generating server: latam.telefonica.corp > > security.tiws at telefonica.com > #550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found > ##rfc822;security.tiws at telefonica.com > > Original message headers: > > Received: from ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) by > ARTASMSP063.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.1.32) with Microsoft SMTP > Server > (TLS) id 22.214.171.124; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:12:06 -0300 > Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (192.168.200.7) by > ARTASMSP072.latam.telefonica.corp (10.213.2.21) with Microsoft SMTP > Server id > 126.96.36.199; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:16:14 -0300 > Received: from artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by > IMSA > (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35D02C8065 for <security.tiws at telefonica.com>; > Mon, > 8 Aug 2011 11:56:46 -0300 (ART) > Received: from smtpauth.pi-group.net (unknown [188.8.131.52]) by > artasgw002.latam.telefonica.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5341C2C8059 for > <security.tiws at telefonica.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 11:56:45 -0300 (ART) > Received: from [192.168.0.129] (d54C0DB02.access.telenet.be > [184.108.40.206]) > (Authenticated sender: admingent) by smtpauth.pi-group.net (Postfix) > with > ESMTPA id B96A01D4175; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:11:54 +0200 (CEST) > Message-ID: <4E3FD2A2.4050605 at webservice.be> > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:12:18 +0200 > From: Webservice <info at webservice.be> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:220.127.116.11) > Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: <security.tiws at telefonica.com> > CC: Cloudforce <cloudforce at ris.be> > Subject: BGP conflict > > > > > Op 09-08-11 18:59, Thor Kottelin schreef: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- >>> admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of abuse at localhost.com >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:02 PM >>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net >> >>> Reply from "abuse.tiws at telefonica.com";=> >>> 10 smtpus.telefonica.com [18.104.22.168]. >>> 550 5.1.1 <abuse.tiws>: >>> Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table. >> >> rcpt to:<abuse.tiws at telefonica.com> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> >> Did you, by any chance, omit the domain name (as "<abuse.tiws>" would >> seem >> to indicate), or did you actually send mail and receive a bounce >> afterwards? >> >> If the address is incorrect, you could report the matter to the RIPE >> NCC, as >> Ms Fragkouli explained a few days ago. >> >> The remaining addresses also seem to work: >> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: thor.kottelin at turvasana.com >>>> Sent: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 18:17:33 +0300 >>>> To: anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net >> >>>> OOM-RIPE >> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> >>>> RSB20-RIPE >> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> >>>> NSA20-RIPE >> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> >>>> HNM15-RIPE >> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> >>>> COO5-RIPE >> >> 250 2.1.5 Ok >> > > -- > -- > www.webservice.be > Amelsdorp 72, 3740 Bilzen, Belgium > Tel: +32.89257404, Fax: +32.70423475 ____________________________________________________________ Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts & access them with a click. Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!