[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Aug 8 17:42:35 CEST 2011
[Catching up after being out of office for a while...] Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: [...] > > Can we turn back to the question that was actually riased in the thread? Yes, please. :-) As Spamhouse was mentioned, and the term "hijacked" pointed at, can anyone please provide me/us with (a pointer to) the definition of "hijacked", in particular as used by Spamhouse? TIA, Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]