[anti-abuse-wg] whooh Suresh! Thank you for this 1. How about LASNIC?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): Wrong "brian.nisbet at heanet.ie" (Was)=>[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[email protected]
world.antispam.report at inbox.com
Mon Aug 8 17:24:40 CEST 2011
I already seen the one for APNIC but don't have anything for LASNIC. If you can help... Anyhow, thanks again! -----Original Message----- From: ops.lists at gmail.com Sent: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:48:38 +0530 To: kzorba at otenet.gr Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database http://wdprs.internic.net/ Yes its not perfect Yes it exists and is actively used On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Kostas Zorbadelos <kzorba at otenet.gr> wrote: > On 08/08/2011 11:03 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> >> RIPE's existing policies*should* cover this - but there's a notable >> lack of a formalzed resolution process on the lines of wdprs for >> domains. >> > > What exactly is "wdprs" ? > > Regards, > > Kostas > >> thanks >> suresh > > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com) ____________________________________________________________ TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5 Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends through IMs, post on Twitter®, Facebook®, MySpace™, LinkedIn® – FAST!
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] RIPE NCC Procedure Regarding LIR Information in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): Wrong "brian.nisbet at heanet.ie" (Was)=>[anti-abuse-wg] Hijacked netblocks - any SOP for these?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]