[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Sep 30 09:04:34 CEST 2010
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:25:57PM +0000, Richard Cox wrote: > The bottom line is that the real responsibility is at the start of the > food chain ... the LIR that validated and submitted the original data. > Which is why I think our first policy proposal should be that the name > of the LIR (if any) that validated the original data, with a link to > their contact details, must be included in the WHOIS response on every > WHOIS lookup (port 43 or website, -b or no -b). I was testing the waters about that during RIPE 59 Meeting (RIPE NCC Services Working Group session). You can find my short presentation here: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-59/presentations/strzyzewski-inet6num-autnum.pdf According to my memory and to the minutes from the session there were mixed feelings about that. I was supposed to bring this topic back to the mailing list. Unfortunately (shame to me) I was extremally busy after meeting and totally forgot about that. Maybe this is the right time to make this a formal proposal and start a discussion? Regards, Piotr Strzyżewski -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]