[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Sep 30 03:30:07 CEST 2010
On Sep 29, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Richard Cox wrote: > Ronald F Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote: >> In my own experience, there do exist quite a substantial number of ARIN >> whois records which, as we speak, contain either outright fradulent, or >> semi-fradulent information, including entity names, snail-mail addresses, >> phone numbers, and contact e-mail addresses. > > Sure. That's not what I was talking about. All RIRs have that problem > to a greater or lesser degree. What seems to me to be unique to RIPE is > the frequency of assignment of IP blocks/ASNs, to entities that fail to > qualify for those resources under the relevant RIR's policies. Can you please substantiate this claim? Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]