[anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Sep 29 23:26:12 CEST 2010
Hi Richard, > Additionally if I were > the actual proposer of a policy, I would be unable to contribute to > that (or any related) decision-making-process. Which is why I'd be > a lot happier if other participants would consider making proposals. Don't worry about this. That's one reason why a working group has more than one chair :-) We sometimes have this situation in the Address Policy Working Group. Look at proposal 2010-04 for example. Gert proposed it and took part in the discussion. I don't take part in any discussion so I can make an objective decision on whether the working group reached consensus ore not. And then the whole working group chairs collective checks to see if I have followed the process correctly and that my decision about consensus is correct. You can write a proposal. There are enough safeguards to make sure that the policy development process is followed in a fair, honest, clear, transparent, etc way. Looking forward to your first proposal! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reporting Fraud
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]