[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Fri Nov 12 14:25:17 CET 2010
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 02:14:50PM +0100, Frank Gadegast wrote: Hi >> One more time - some pros from the original email: >> >> - Reduced resource consumption: there will be no extra objects in DB (we >> save some disk space) and there will be no extra references (we save >> some whois servers' processors time). Both means: we save some money. :) > > Not at all. > Modern databases will use less resources when referencing objects > from other tables instead of copying information to many other objects. > Using the IRT object will save resources. What I was thinking about was that I'm affraid that a lot of LIRs will make a lot (with scripts, basing on current admin-c,tech-c) of IRT objects for its customers. This will consume resources. > Furthermore: the definition of the IRT object does not to be changed. > Simply that the abuse-field is mandatory in the future, and that a link > to all INETNUM objects to an IRT object is required. > Sounds pretty easy to implement ... Adding mandatory abuse-mailbox is as easy as that. >> - IRT object still can be used as it is used right now (if LIR want's to >> monitor abuse, even if the inet(6)num or aut-num is handled by its >> customer) > > That will be confusing for everybody. Don't think so. > BTW: I have no opinion for you proposal under > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-10.html > yet, but find the following really interesting: > > "A clear statement that the resources will return by default to the RIPE > NCC if the resource holder cannot be contacted". > > Im having hopes, if we put that together with Tobias' > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-09.html > > (BIG SMILE) This is happening now. :D You should definately read things more carefull. This is a part of current "Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resource Holders in the RIPE NCC Service Region." Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]