[anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 10 11:57:31 CET 2010
On 10 nov 2010, at 11:30, Sander Steffann wrote: >> That being said, I still think a single canonical place to store abuse >> handling information is A Very Good Thing. > > +1 Be careful of what you wish for, maybe somebody can produce the same stats as I did back in 2004: - number of inet(6)num covered by IRT - number of inet(6)num covered by abuse-mailbox attributes - Number of inet(6)num containing a remarks field with the words 'complaint' or 'abuse' in it Creating a 'single point' makes it implicit that others should disappear and you might throw away a load of data and you don't know what you will get back for it. Groet, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]