[anti-abuse-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:54:31PM +0100, Tobias Knecht wrote:

Hi

> This gives more flexibility to the ISPs. Think about business ISPs
> delegating a /24 to a customer and this customer wants to do his own
> abuse handling. Yes such customers really exists ;-) Today this is a
> huge problem and creates more trouble for NOCs than helping them or
> their abuse department.

I'm pretty much sure that a lot of LIRs will make a script to create irt
objects basing on actual whois data. That's why and because there are so
many inetnum objects in the DB I have mixed feelings about that
proposal.
I think that we can do something bit different - we can make irt objects
mandatory for new object types (INET-REG, INET6-REG and AS-REG). Of
course if those new object types will be eventually implemented.

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl