[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Sat Jul 24 18:06:06 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 04:32:05PM +0200, Tobias Knecht wrote: Hi > I would suggest the following. [cut] > The next step is a policy proposal that does the following things: > > - Introduce the IRT Object into ASN Objects. > - Make the abuse-mailbox attribute mandatory for the IRT Objects. > - Make IRT Objects mandatory for directly by RIPE delegated Ranges. So why are you not going to propose that under PDP? Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Contact Information - Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]