[anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Dec 23 09:31:06 CET 2010
In message <AANLkTi=pcQVGC3gut2saQ3McwzJrs=CNF_1dNjw6Hny1 at mail.gmail.com>, Esa Laitinen <esa.laitinen at iki.fi> wrote: >On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com >> wrote: > >> I confess that I am utterly baffled by your comment. The message from BofA >> seemed altogether clear and entirely straightforward and unambiguous to me. >> >> What is it, exactly, about that message that caused you to have any >> difficulty >> in "working it out"? >> >> >Well, I for one had hard time to find the beef, and I'm language skills are >reasonably good. Assuming that the above was not a veiled attempt at humor, allow me to say that some might find cause to question your assertion, embedded within the assertion itself. But yes, as I previously agreed (in another posting), the language of the notice from BofA was indeed verbose, prolix, and failed to clarify the issue that prompted the e-mail within the first sentence, as it should have. Regards, rfg
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] How Not To Ask For A Website to Be taken Down
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]