[anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question regarding IP address abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Mon Dec 20 10:35:22 CET 2010
Peter, "Peter Koch" wrote the following on 18/12/2010 16:43: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 03:47:42PM +0000, Brian Nisbet wrote: > >> Peter Koch said the session was already overrun by 15 minutes and this >> delicate issue should be resolved at another time. > > I'd like to clarify that my point was that this topic was placed under AOB > _and_ mostly dealt with during overtime, which, absence of written process > and procedures nonwithstanding, did not meet my expectations and experiences > of appropriateness given delicacy. That said, I consider the issue closed. So noted, on both counts, the published minutes will be amended to reflect this. Brian.
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Anti-Abuse WG Minutes ? RIPE 61
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Question regarding IP address abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]