[anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
andre at ox.co.za
andre at ox.co.za
Tue Aug 10 07:40:12 CEST 2010
Frank Gadegast said on Monday 09 August 2010 : > Thor Kottelin wrote: > >> removing networks from RIPEs databased > >> will also remove all reverse mapping and nameserver entries, right > >> ? > >> > >> No mailserver, that is configured to fight only a bit against spam > >> accepts mail from IPs without a working reverse mapping. > >> > >> So, if RIPE ever wants to punish network abusers, thats an easy way > >> of > >> doing it ... > > > > I agree that this may be a somewhat effective approach. > > > > All this is technically easy, the only thing missing is a discussion, > who decides, what objects need to be remove and why. > This is the best idea that I have heard in a long time and there could be proper structures in place (similiar to spamcop) to prevent abuse Andre
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: how to punish a spammer
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]