[anti-abuse-wg] spam definition

2010/4/11 Frank Gadegast <phade at www.powerweb.de>

> I think that everything IS spam, what somebody, who receives it, is
> bothered
> with, because he did no want it, he feel offended, did not ask for it
> or whatever personal reason.
>
>
Really? So the newsletter you've subscribed yesterday, received the first
issue today and was happy about it, turns into spam tomorrow when they
publish a story that annoys you?

Now we're entering very interesting terrain...



> You have a mail address and receive stuff you did not ask for,
> that has nothing to do with business or interest.
>

No, but it is something to do with consent, don't you think? The consent
should be the most important thing when considering if something is spam.



> And if I feel abused, I think its spam.
>

I might think that white is black, but it doesn't make it so. Consent, that
is the key.

And thats excatly what is the background idea of a spam report
> delivery system.
> Let the recipient decide, what he think hes abuse about.
>
> So, are you talking about abuse, or are you talking about spam?


-- 
Esa Laitinen
Tel. +41 76 200 2870
skype/yahoo: reunaesa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20100412/e1aa85f4/attachment.html>