[anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thor Kottelin
thor.kottelin at turvasana.com
Thu Apr 8 16:30:36 CEST 2010
> -----Original Message----- > From: anti-abuse-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- > admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Bradley Freeman > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 4:45 PM > To: 'Frank Gadegast'; anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net > And if the only benefit is a common abuse alias, hasn't this has > already > been suggested with an abuse@ address in RFC2142 - Mailbox Names > for Common > Services, Roles and Functions which is not RIPE region specific? It is not always obvious which abuse@ domain should be selected for a particular IP address. I like the suggestion of routing reports according to the IP address of the abuse source. -- Thor Kottelin http://www.anta.net/
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] DRAFT: RIPE proposal - implementation of an abuse monitor system
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]