[anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
peter h
peter at hk.ipsec.se
Tue Apr 6 17:26:20 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 15.10, Dr. Alexander K. Seewald wrote: > IMHO just having blacklists based on IP addresses is not enough: > * rapidly increasing mobile internet (which has dynamic IPs unless > one keeps a connection open indefinitely - hardly ever the case) > * tendency to reuse one bot for an ever decreasing number of spam messages > - so blacklist are and always getting to be less helpful. spamblocklists works often on whole ranges. MIne does ( i block the whole range assigned by ripe/apnic/arin for ISP's that allow spam to flow out of their nets) But i agree; blocking single ip's does not help. > <snip> > So here's to hoping the spammers die out from the current crisis and > we can switch off all our spamfilters... I wouldn't bet on this. As long as law-enforcement does not hunt spammers we will continue to have the spamproblem. What if spam would be characterized as terrorism, then maybe ISP had to act ... > > Best, > Alex -- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Re: update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]