[anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Frank Gadegast
phade at www.powerweb.de
Tue Apr 6 15:47:22 CEST 2010
> > For APNIC prop-079 there was a great deal of opposition but still it got the > consensus because of optimisim it shares. Again there is no procedure of > penalizing the members for not updating the abuse-c contact and than there > is no method to make sure the abuse-c is active or not. LACNIC and ARIN Not yet, that will be the next step. Its quite easy for APNIC to send an email twice a year to all abuse-contacts including a link, that has to be clicked. With that you could publish a list of non-responsive provider and you will have another instrument to measure good from bad. Kind regards, Frank -- PHADE Software - PowerWeb http://www.powerweb.de Inh. Dipl.-Inform. Frank Gadegast mailto:frank at powerweb.de Schinkelstrasse 17 fon: +49 33200 52920 14558 Nuthetal OT Rehbruecke, Germany fax: +49 33200 52921 ====================================================================== Public PGP Key available for frank at powerweb.de > already have this policy with slight changes for quite sometime, how was the > response in that region related to spam? > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: > > > Frank, > > > > > > This group IS the community, so why is their no proposal so far ? > >> After 2 years ? > >> > > > > There has been an amount of discussion on this topic in both AA and DB > > working groups over the last few years but no concensus has been reached. > > > > At the meeting in Lisbon it was agreed between DB and AA that as no further > > comments had been made, the matter was to be closed. This does not, > > obviously, mean that it can't be raised again and both WGs would be most > > interested in any proposals you may have. > > > > I would love to work together with more expirienced members of the > >> mailling list, but as far as I see it: simply nothing happens ... > >> > >> The first step should be a mandatory abuse-field. > >> > >> We could simply copy APNICs proposal: > >> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-079 > >> > > > > In this policy Tobias Knecht (tk at abusix.org) has stated that if he is > > successful in APNIC he plans to propose something similar in the RIPE > > region. I would suspect he is the best person to talk to about > > collaboration. > > > > I will note again that previous attemtps to make things mandatory have > > failed, but as we are in a rapidly changing environment, it is difficult to > > predict what response a renewed proposal will bring. As Fearghas points > > out, the NCC are always willing to aid people with proposals, as are the > > relevant WG chairs. > > > > I would, of course, reject that the WG has done nothing in two years and we > > hope, in May, to chair another productive meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brian. > > > > > > --00504502cbef1cc23e048390f106 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <div>For=A0APNIC prop-079 there was a great deal of opposition but still it= > got the consensus because of optimisim it shares. Again there is no proced= > ure of penalizing the members for not updating the abuse-c contact and than= > there is no method to make sure the abuse-c is active or not. LACNIC and A= > RIN already have this policy with slight changes for quite sometime, how wa= > s the response in that region related to spam?</div> > > <div>=A0</div> > <div><br clear=3D"all">Regards,<br><br>Aftab A. Siddiqui<br><br><br></div> > <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Brian Nisbet <sp= > an dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:brian.nisbet at heanet.ie">brian.nisbet at h= > eanet.ie</a>></span> wrote:<br> > <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex= > ; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">Frank,=20 > <div class=3D"im"><br><br> > <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex= > ; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">This group IS the community, so = > why is their no proposal so far ?<br>After 2 years ?<br></blockquote><br></= > div> > There has been an amount of discussion on this topic in both AA and DB work= > ing groups over the last few years but no concensus has been reached.<br><b= > r>At the meeting in Lisbon it was agreed between DB and AA that as no furth= > er comments had been made, the matter was to be closed. =A0This does not, o= > bviously, mean that it can't be raised again and both WGs would be most= > interested in any proposals you may have.<br> > <br> > <blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex= > ; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote"> > <div class=3D"im">I would love to work together with more expirienced membe= > rs of the<br>mailling list, but as far as I see it: simply nothing happens = > ...<br><br></div> > <div class=3D"im">The first step should be a mandatory abuse-field.<br><br>= > We could simply copy APNICs proposal:<br><a href=3D"http://www.apnic.net/po= > licy/proposals/prop-079" target=3D"_blank">http://www.apnic.net/policy/prop= > osals/prop-079</a><br> > </div></blockquote><br>In this policy Tobias Knecht (<a href=3D"mailto:tk at a= > busix.org" target=3D"_blank">tk at abusix.org</a>) has stated that if he is su= > ccessful in APNIC he plans to propose something similar in the RIPE region.= > =A0I would suspect he is the best person to talk to about collaboration.<b= > r> > <br>I will note again that previous attemtps to make things mandatory have = > failed, but as we are in a rapidly changing environment, it is difficult to= > predict what response a renewed proposal will bring. =A0As Fearghas points= > out, the NCC are always willing to aid people with proposals, as are the r= > elevant WG chairs.<br> > <br>I would, of course, reject that the WG has done nothing in two years an= > d we hope, in May, to chair another productive meeting.<br><br>Thanks,<br><= > font color=3D"#888888"><br>Brian.<br><br></font></blockquote></div><br> > > --00504502cbef1cc23e048390f106-- >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] update on netsecdb project
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]