[address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Stanislav
ms at uakom.sk
Tue May 28 10:16:54 CEST 2013
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Emilio Madaio wrote: > > A draft of the policy document is now online and ready for community > review at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/readability/improving-the-readability-of-ripe-documents May I suggest to omit the first occurence of "Only" in the section "2.1 Definitions" to keep to text more self-contained? Currently proposed text: Only the inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”. Suggested change: The inet6num object may use the value of "AGGREGATED-BY-LIR" for the “status:" attribute and contain the attribute “assignment-size:”. Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reminder:Cosmetic Surgery Project, new revised RIPE Policy, document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]