[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space

Agree 

 

 

From: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net
[mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Sonderegger Olaf
ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG
Sent: 2013 m. birželio 26 d. 12:11
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: [address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI
Address Space

 

Hi all

 

My question is: Why RIPE NCC should go one step back instead one step
forward?

 

I remember an idea to remove status "Provider Aggregatable" (PA) and
"Provider Independent" (PI) for IPv6 addresses [see Ref 1 / Ref 2]. If we go
ahead with this idea and open it for any kind of IP address, than final
result is the same as current guidance request.

 

Ref 1: http://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/148-wg.pdf
<http://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/148-wg.pdf%20/> 

Ref 2: http://ripe63.ripe.net/presentations/143-wg3.pdf

 

I think, I could accept request as our first step in direction of removing
status "Provider Aggregatable" (PA) and "Provider Independent" (PI).

 

Best regards,

Olaf Sonderegger

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130626/b1cf78d4/attachment.html>