[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period until 9 July on revised RIPE Policy document for IPv6 database objects
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period until 9 July on revised RIPE Policy document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Monosov
davidm at futureinquestion.net
Tue Jun 25 16:09:09 CEST 2013
Dear address-policy-wg, This has unintentionally gone out as a reply to Emilio's post '[address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period until 9 July on revised RIPE Policy document for IPv6 database objects' but was meant as a response to Andrea's post '[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Reassigning Referenced ASNs'; my apologies. -- Respectfully yours, David Monosov On 06/25/2013 04:05 PM, David Monosov wrote: > Dear Andrea Cima, address-policy-wg, > > Since it is not included as an option, is there any reason why simply > reassigning the AS numbers after a period of time, but notifying object > maintainers which reference the AS number that this has occurred (or is about to > occur) would not be the best solution? > > Keeping limited resources out of the recycling pool because of laziness or lack > of situational awareness of some operators seems like a poor approach. > > Butchering object and outdated RPSL policies of operators and replacing them > with selectively less outdated versions automatically seems undesirable as well > since it may break any further operator automation which (wrongfully or not) may > rely on those objects. > > -- > Respectfully yours, > > David Monosov > > On 06/25/2013 03:29 PM, Emilio Madaio wrote: >> >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> As part of the Cosmetic Surgery Project, the RIPE NCC is moving forward >> with a review of the policy document ripe-513, "Value of the "status:" >> and "assignment-size:" attributes in INET6NUM objects for sub-assigned >> PA space". >> >> A draft of the policy document is online and ready for community >> review at: >> >> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/readability/improving-the-readability-of-ripe-documents >> >> The Address Policy Working Group Co-Chairs decided to extend the review >> period until 9 July 2013 to allow the community more time to give their >> feedback. >> >> Please send your feedback on this draft document to the Address Policy >> Working Group at <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>. >> >> Kind regards, >> Emilio Madaio >> Policy Development Officer >> RIPE NCC >>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period until 9 July on revised RIPE Policy document for IPv6 database objects
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Extended Review Period until 9 July on revised RIPE Policy document for IPv6 database objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]