[address-policy-wg] Guidance Requested: Changing the Status of PI Address Space

On 20/06/2013 14:29, Opteamax GmbH wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 13:28, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
>> Andrea, all -
>>
>> full ACK to both:
>>
>> * Allow status change from LIRs' PI assignments to PA allocations
>>
>> and to Tore's point:
>>
>> * Omission of the minimum allocation size constraint
>>
> Full +1 from my side.
>
> from ripe perspective the only difference I can see is the fact that PI
> is charged seperately. I clearly remember the (funny mentioned) words at
> last GM: "we are already trying hard to make a deficit, but obviously we
> failed again"  ... so allowing new LIR to migrate there PI into PA could
> be at least a way to reduce the income ;)
>
I'm glad someone was listening :-)

FWIW, and wearing my own personal hat (the grey-green waterproof one 
that I had to buy in Amsterdam one year to stop from drowning in the 
rain), I think this is a good idea. We're going to discuss it at the 
board meeting next week.

Nigel