[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6/32 to /29 > on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)

Sat Jan 5 01:21:14 CET 2013

Hi,

I do support this proposal too.

Regards,
Mehar Iftikhar Ahmad

> From: address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net
> Subject: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:00:02 +0100
> 
> Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to
> 	address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	address-policy-wg-request at ripe.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	address-policy-wg-owner at ripe.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29
>       on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Sascha Luck)
>    2. FW: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of	IPv6/32 to /29
>       on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Sleigh, Robert)
>    3. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of	IPv6/32 to /29
>       on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Sleigh, Robert)
>    4. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29
>       on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Julien Rabier)
>    5. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of	IPv6 /32 to
>       /29) (Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG)
>    6. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29
>       on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Anfinsen, Ragnar)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:47:42 +0000
> From: Sascha Luck <lists-ripe at c4inet.net>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <20130102154742.GA49689 at cilantro.c4inet.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> 
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:12:50AM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
> >    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10
> 
> Support +1
> 
> cheers,
> Sascha Luck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:28:47 -0000
> From: "Sleigh, Robert" <Robert.Sleigh at ee.co.uk>
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] FW: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of	IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<7589326DC369BE4EAACEB3A2EB92F8E31172F57C at HATMSG025.TMOUSERSUK.AD.T-MOBILE.CO.UK>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> 
> I support this proposal, +1
> 
> Regards
>  
> Bob
> 07958 318592
>  
> Life's for sharing... and what I like to share the most is a smile
>  
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net
> [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio
> Sent: 31 December 2012 10:13
> To: policy-announce at ripe.net
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of
> IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> 
> A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation
> and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10
> 
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
> 
> NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for the above-named person(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not disclose or use for any purpose.  
>  
> We may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. We have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, but it remains your responsibility to ensure that viruses do not adversely affect you. 
> 
> Everything Everywhere Limited
> Registered in England and Wales
> Company Registered Number: 02382161
> Registered Office Address: Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9BW
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:28:48 -0000
> From: "Sleigh, Robert" <Robert.Sleigh at ee.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of	IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> To: <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<7589326DC369BE4EAACEB3A2EB92F8E31172F568 at HATMSG025.TMOUSERSUK.AD.T-MOBILE.CO.UK>
> 	
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Support +1
> 
> Regards
>  
> Bob
> 07958 318592
>  
> Life's for sharing... and what I like to share the most is a smile
>  
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net
> [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio
> Sent: 31 December 2012 10:13
> To: policy-announce at ripe.net
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of
> IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> 
> A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation
> and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10
> 
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
> 
> NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
> This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended for the above-named person(s).  If you are not the intended recipient, notify the sender immediately, delete this email from your system and do not disclose or use for any purpose.  
>  
> We may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. We have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, but it remains your responsibility to ensure that viruses do not adversely affect you. 
> 
> Everything Everywhere Limited
> Registered in England and Wales
> Company Registered Number: 02382161
> Registered Office Address: Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9BW
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 08:47:27 +0100
> From: Julien Rabier <jrabier at ilico.org>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID: <20130103074727.GA4475 at taupo>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Le 31 d?c. ? 11:12, Emilio Madaio a ?crit :
> > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation
> > and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.
> 
> I support this proposal.
> 
> Julien
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:37:52 +0000
> From: Sonderegger Olaf ABRAXAS INFORMATIK AG
> 	<Olaf.Sonderegger at abraxas.ch>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of	IPv6 /32 to /29)
> To: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<7C49C19C69319E4FB1279CA15A84D18B61D6E929 at SAX10244.bia.abraxas.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Dear all
> 
> First: I wish everyone a good start in 2013.
> 
> Second: I support Emilio's proposal.
> 
> Best regards, Olaf
> 
> --
> Olaf Sonderegger
> Dipl. Ingenieur FH
> IT Architekt
> Shared Services Operations
> 
> Abraxas Informatik AG
> 
> Waltersbachstrasse 5 | CH-8006 Z?rich
> Direkt +41 58 660 44 94 | Mobile +41 79 708 70 86 | Fax +41 58 660 00 09
> olaf.sonderegger at abraxas.ch | www.abraxas.ch
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130103/d3f4cb3d/attachment-0001.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:43:47 +0000
> From: "Anfinsen, Ragnar" <Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no>
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal
> 	(Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
> To: "address-policy-wg at ripe.net" <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>,
> 	"policy-announce at ripe.net" <policy-announce at ripe.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<B6EC5D0A5C7E6943850073343D2E55C240BDC480 at prdmbx02.lyse.no>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> I support this proposal.
> 
> /Ragnar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 31.12.12 11:12, "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> >Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> >A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation
> >and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.
> >
> >
> >You can find the full proposal at:
> >
> >    https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10
> >
> >We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> ><address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Emilio Madaio
> >Policy Development Officer
> >RIPE NCC
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> End of address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4
> ************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20130105/4d89933c/attachment.html>