[address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anfinsen, Ragnar
Ragnar.Anfinsen at altibox.no
Thu Jan 3 10:43:47 CET 2013
I support this proposal. /Ragnar On 31.12.12 11:12, "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio at ripe.net> wrote: > >Dear Colleagues, > > >A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation >and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion. > > >You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10 > >We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to ><address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 28 January 2013. > >Regards > >Emilio Madaio >Policy Development Officer >RIPE NCC > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]