[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Thu Sep 27 12:24:50 CEST 2012
* Tore Anderson > Oh my. There is a problem here. Hmm. I think that if there is a problem, it's just with me sending out e-mails too quickly. :-) I think I ended up confusing my own proposal with the last /8 proposal... So unless I'm mistaken, the policy document immediately preceding the implementation of Run Out Fairly, was: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-471 The first document that contained Run Out Fairly, and that obsoleted ripe-471, was: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-484 Having double-checked the differences between the two, I do believe that the changes my proposal would do, is what I've advertised - the exact differences between the policy after and before the implementation of Run Out Fairly. The sentence you pointed out, about the «special circumstances», was present in ripe-471, at least. My apologies for crying wolf here. -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]