[address-policy-wg] Temporary Internet Assignments policy

On 17 Sep 2012, at 17:59, Martin Millnert wrote:

> Why can't conferences run NAT-something+IPv6 like the rest of  
> everything?

Let's avoid this rat-hole.

The issue is whether there should be temporary assignments or not.  
Whatever the justifications are for (not) having these or other  
approaches to solving those issues simply don't matter.

The question here is simple and needs no refinement or qualifications.  
They just complicate matters and don't help. Should there be temporary  
assignments? Yes or no.

My personal preference is to burn through all the remaining IPv4 space  
as quickly as possible in the (probably forlorn) hope that it puts an  
end to these angels on pinhead debates. :-)