[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Sep 17 11:47:11 CEST 2012
Hi, On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:31:30AM +0200, Florian Fuessl wrote: > How about limiting IPv4 PI assignments to a total max of /12 (?) within the > remaining /8 pool? This sounds somewhat familiar. "Limit IPv4 PI to all but the last /8" Last /8 reached "Limit IPv4 PI to just a /12 out of the last /8" that /12 empty "Limit IPv4 PI to another /12 out of the last /8" ... I'm not sure if "every time the available pool for X is empty, just grab another slice of the rest and declare it to be 'available for X, but limited!!'" is a reasonable strategy... Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]