[address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hamed Shafaghi
hamed at skydsl.ir
Fri Sep 14 16:20:52 CEST 2012
It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP address for next three months but my company after giving all requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 subnet!!! On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hamed, > > Yes, it's a lottery! > > Sorry that you didn't win. > > I didn't either, tried to get a PI out. :) But didn't get it. > > Best, > Martin > > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 18:47 +0430, Hamed Shafaghi wrote: > > It’s a shame, a company with fraudulent methods receive 1 million IP > > address for next three months but my company after giving all > > requested statics will receive /22 subnet instead of at least /14 > > subnet!!! > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Martin Millnert <millnert at gmail.com> > > wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 15:56 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote: > > > The delegated-ripencc-extended-latest shows which blocks > > were free at the start of the day, then it's just a matter of > > some whois queries to figure out the rest. > > > > > > Right now it seems 128.0.107.0-128.0.111.255 are still free, > > plus those five /24s out of 192/8 I listed earlier. And maybe > > those /25+es (didn't check as I'm on the road at the moment). > > So it's pretty much all gone now. > > > > > > Tore > > > > > > Right, as per the announcements [1][2] as well, we're > > officially in > > final /8 land now, and IPRAs ran the "available pool" down to > > the > > ground. > > > > So, somewhere between 35-60M EUR locked up for the RIPE NCC > > now, from > > one-shot-LIRs, with current policy. Does the RIPE NCC need all > > this > > money or will that complicate things, especially w.r.t IPv4 as > > an asset > > issues? Or does it matter what we do? > > > > IPv4 just became an asset in this land regardless. :-) > > > > Best, > > Martin > > > > [1] > > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2012-September/000615.html > > [2] > > > https://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/news/ripe-ncc-begins-to-allocate-ipv4-address-space-from-the-last-8 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > I Hamed Shafaghi I > > I Managing Director I > > > > I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed at skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I > > > -- I Hamed Shafaghi I I Managing Director I I Skydsl® Telecom I hamed at skydsl.ir I www.skydsl.ir I -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120914/0b495376/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Now that final /8 policy may be in action ...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]