[address-policy-wg] 2012-04 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignments from the last /8)

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> That said, I don't know if APWG have any influence on the NCC's charging
> scheme at all. Is it possible for this policy to say something along the
> lines of «joining the NCC and obtaining a PA allocation from the last /8
> should cost approximately the same per address as obtaining a PI
> assignment from the last /8»? Is that in scope of address policy?

APWG can voice an opinion, but that has no legal binding - the fees are
decided (voted!) by the paying members in the RIPE NCC general meeting 
(AGM).  

So while the NCC board may listen to us (and usually does), and propose 
a corresponding fee structure, if the members vote against it, APWG has 
no way to force anything.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279