[address-policy-wg] Revert Run Out Fairly after IPv4 depletion
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Review Period on Version 2 of Draft Document, for Reverse Address Delegation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Sep 10 08:23:50 CEST 2012
> > Dear Colleagues > > > > A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-553, "IPv4 Address Allocation > > and Assignment Policy for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now > > available for discussion. > > > > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06 > >I see the noble goal of this proposal - but why bother? Do we have even >enough time for this proposal to become valid policy change according to >all valid rules of PDP? > >http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-pool-graph > >According to this graph we have one month to go. > >Cheers, Jan Zorz Reading over http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-06 Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion 5.0 states "As of 1 July 2011, the RIPE NCC will start allocating enough address space to LIRs to meet their needs for a period of up to three months." Can someone explain to me how these two recent allocations fit into this rule (extracted from the delegated file): ripencc|IR|ipv4|5.112.0.0|1048576|20120629|allocated ripencc|IR|ipv4|5.208.0.0|1048576|20120904|allocated -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: Review Period on Version 2 of Draft Document, for Reverse Address Delegation of IPv4 and IPv6 Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]