[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Ingvoldstad
frettled at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 14:54:59 CEST 2012
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote: > <provoking>I don't see how anyone can be against this proposal.</provoking> > I don't see the real world benefit of the proposal, there are insufficient arguments for it, and I'm therefore with Tore on this one. (So now you perhaps see how anyone _can_ be against it.) -- Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120906/d0790d57/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]