[address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Mon Sep 3 17:47:37 CEST 2012
Hi Jan, > I see the noble goal of this proposal - but why bother? Do we have even enough time for this proposal to become valid policy change according to all valid rules of PDP? > http://www.ripe.net/internet-coordination/ipv4-exhaustion/ipv4-available-poo l-graph > According to this graph we have one month to go. This would also apply for the transfer policies I assume. So if 2009:03 would be reverted, it would also allow transfers of larger blocks than what one might consume in 3 months. Which would be good looking at routing table size imho. Erik Bais
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-06 New Policy Proposal (Revert "Run Out Fairly" after IPv4 depletion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]