[address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon Sep 3 12:38:37 CEST 2012
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 12:28:59PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >So... Again your feedback please! Is there anyone who thinks that >anonymising details of rejected transfers is a bad idea? (and if so: >please explain why) I'd go one further and anonymise all transfer data. Who has an operational *need-to-know* this data? rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-05 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]