[address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Wed Oct 31 14:49:15 CET 2012
* Rob Evans > I'm a little curious about this mention of 'fast-tracking.' The word > 'fast' doesn't, perhaps unsurprisingly, appear anywhere in the PDP. > > <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-500> > > The only opportunity to reduce the time taken for the process is by > shrinking the review period, which is listed to last "no more than > four weeks." Given the deadline for this period has already been > sent for November 27th, I'm not sure what scope there is for 'fast > tracking.' :) I was referring to Gert's reply to Nina's comment in the APWG session at RIPE65, see https://ripe65.ripe.net/archives/video/110/ and skip to 17:50. In http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/policy-development-process-glossary it says that «the default duration for the review period is four weeks, although the WG Chair can reduce this», so I was assuming that was what he meant by "fast-track". Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Draft and Impact Analysis Document Published (Revert 'Run Out Fairly')
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]