[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun Oct 14 14:10:26 CEST 2012
Hi, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:06:04PM +0400, LeaderTelecom B.V. wrote: > > > Permanenent transfer cost [...] > > > Please remember that the current transfer policy explicitly states "This > > re-allocation may be on either a permanent or non-permanent basis." so you > can > > already use the current transfer policy for temporary transfers. > > After temporary transfer you can receive back IPs which listed in Spamhouse. > I don't know any company which will temporary transfers IPs. So how is this different from a sub-allocation which is then listed in Spamhouse? I'm finding this argument difficult to understand. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] FW: Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]