[address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom B.V.
info at leadertelecom.nl
Thu Oct 11 13:20:52 CEST 2012
Dear Michiel, > Removing the needs-based requirement would break open the entire IPv4 > market, letting big corporations to buy everything available and then decide > who they are willing to sell it for the highest price. I think big companies can approve via RIPE any transfers while they have thousands work places, servers, and etc. If we discuss sub-allocations - then allocated PA block won't changed. And they can't sell too high. > IP addresses will become a tool to obstruct competitors, wipe-out all > smaller players and locking the market for newcomers. Newcomers can get 1024 IPv4 as new LIR. I think any restrictions only increase prices. All people usually busy (who not busy here?). If someone has IP and can very simple give it to someone - then more IPs will be available and prices for IP will be lower. I had this situation - in one company told me that they can sub-allocate IP, but don't have any time for bureaucracy. > An authority > validating each request with the current policies could somewhat prevent > that from happening. Aha.. Just check big blocks (100k IPs and more) which were allocated before IPv4 were finished in RIPE. Of course I think all was made as it was written in policy. It is just a black hole in policy. Conclusion: let’s make simple regulation. Less paperwork, more freedom. -- Kind regards, Alexey Ivanov LeaderTelecom B.V. Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20121011/b9e63e97/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [Ticket#2012092701011684] Sub-allocations - fast and simple re-using IP-addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]