[address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP

Thank you very much for the reply. Just what I needed.

Med venlig hilsen/Kind regards

Richard Krogh
IT Infrastructure Technical Consultant
_______________________________

Grontmij A/S
Granskoven 8
DK-2600 Glostrup
Denmark

T + 45 4348 4744
M + 45 2723 4744
F + 45 4348 6789
E Richard.Krogh at grontmij.dk<mailto:Richard.Krogh at grontmij.dk>
W www.grontmij.dk<http://www.grontmij.dk>

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

From: Erik Bais [mailto:erik at bais.name]
Sent: 22. februar 2012 16:16
To: Richard Krogh (RKG); address-policy-wg at ripe.net
Subject: RE: Multihomed demand for ISP

Hi Richard,

It is not required to even have your own network. You could have some other network provider advertise your prefix and have them do the routing ..

Is if recommended to have a network which is multi-homed .. YES.. but it is not required to run the LIR PA space on your own network.

Being a LIR doesn't make one an ISP... A LIR is just a registration office for IP addresses.
We run the LIR PA IP space of a city for instance on our network in the Netherlands. And the prefixes of another LIR ISP that decided not to run their own network anymore.

In both cases they rely on our network to keep it up and running for them. So they don't have to.

Does that help ?

Regards,
Erik Bais

Erik Bais | A2B Internet BV | +31 299 707 115 ( Office ) | ebais at a2b-internet.com<mailto:ebais at a2b-internet.com> |




From: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net> [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net]<mailto:[mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net]> On Behalf Of Richard Krogh (RKG)
Sent: woensdag 22 februari 2012 14:28
To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: [address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP

Hi.

Not shure if I am writing in the correct forum, but here goes:

My company is recognized as an ISP, caused by our lease/reservation of RIPE based IP addresses.

Question:
Is it a ripe-demand that ISPs should have multihomed lines to their equipment or is single line OK? (beware that I am not talking of performance or the company's safety, only about what demands RIPE require).

Thanks in advance.

Richard Krogh


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120223/528c17ef/attachment.html>