[address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2011-02: "Removal of Multihomed Requirement for IPv6 PI" Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Krogh (RKG)
Richard.Krogh at grontmij.dk
Wed Feb 22 14:27:57 CET 2012
Hi. Not shure if I am writing in the correct forum, but here goes: My company is recognized as an ISP, caused by our lease/reservation of RIPE based IP addresses. Question: Is it a ripe-demand that ISPs should have multihomed lines to their equipment or is single line OK? (beware that I am not talking of performance or the company's safety, only about what demands RIPE require). Thanks in advance. Richard Krogh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120222/95110b62/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2011-02: "Removal of Multihomed Requirement for IPv6 PI" Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Multihomed demand for ISP
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]