[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Wed Feb 15 22:20:18 CET 2012
On 2/15/12 9:10 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:47:59AM -0500, Tiberiu Ungureanu wrote: >> Existing IPv6 space holders can request (under the new policy) >> space to get them to /29. Should they NEED more, based on their >> existing users, they would probably qualify to request additional >> space. If they don't qualify to request additional space, do they >> really NEED more? > > The problem is that the "additional allocation" policy is far more > draconian than the "initial allocation" policy. > > HD ratio doesn't matter for the initial alloc, but for any > additional alloc. What I read here is that probably we'll have to revise additional alloc policy part when we are done with 2011-04, am I right? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]