[address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Mon Apr 2 17:15:30 CEST 2012
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 04:59:55PM +0200, Chris wrote: >actually this audaciously breaches policy. Nope, not necessarily. >if ips are not required anymore, their assignment expires. if an >allocation is not needed by a lir anymore, it must be returned to >the rir. assignment != allocation Forcing a LIR to return unused /24s out of their allocation would force the LIR to de-aggregate the rest of that allocation (presumably into /24s). Of course, so does this proposal... rgds, s.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2012-01 New Policy Proposal (Inter-RIR IPv4 Address Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]