[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 21:49:16 CEST 2011
Gert and all, On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:42:59AM -0700, Scott Leibrand wrote: > > It's worth noting that a similar PI policy has been in place in the ARIN > > region for some time now, and has not resulted in any large increase in > the > > IPv6 routing table. > > Yes. I have watched the global table fairly closely for the last years, > and indeed, the number of PI routes in the global IPv6 table is well > under control so far (and the rate it's growing is also under control). > > Slides up to May are in my RIPE62 IPv6 routing table report, but if it > helps, I can go through the numbers and provide up-to-date graphs. > > Sander's announcement also had the most recent numbers of PA-vs-PI routes > in it. > Right. If the situation remain reasonable, then the educatedly guessed limit will never hit, and everybody will be happy. However, I think we should be prepared for the worst scenario as well. > > Gert Doering > -- just providing background data > Best, Géza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110929/ea124641/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] scaling # of prefixes Re: Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]