[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Fri Sep 23 16:28:36 CEST 2011
Hi Sander, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 04:11:35PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >This is not part of the policy but a suggestion to the RIPE NCC. >It seemed useful information to have, but if people think it is >not then we won't suggest this to the NCC. However, all of this >is part of the implementation (which is up to the NCC) and not >part of the policy. The policy hasn't changed. This suggestion, if followed, would implicitly become policy without consensus from the PDP. I assume that is what Nick alludes to in his reply. IMO, that would be a dangerous precedent to set. Besides, the request form already contains the "why-pi" question. A requirement to "prove that you're worthy" would just lead to applicants concocting whatever story they think the IPRA will believe and be completely useless information. >Considering that this well-intended suggestion to the NCC seems >to have caused controversy and distract from the actual policy >proposal we will not send the suggestion to the NCC. Without the requirement I do, of course, fully support the policy. cheers, Sascha
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]