[address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
boggits
boggits at gmail.com
Mon May 23 13:43:09 CEST 2011
On 23 May 2011 12:34, Remco Van Mook <Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote: > This proposal only means to clarify what happens to address space that is > returned to the RIPE NCC after that point, and makes sure we have > allocation policy in place for all the address space that the RIPE NCC > holds. Having a policy in place that provides the ability to hand out all > currently held address space, along with an upper limit that is lower than > the most common minimum allocation size, will have an impact on the > minimum allocation size for those blocks. > > If the chairs feel otherwise, and think this policy proposal means to > re-evaluate the text of the current final /8 policy, I will withdraw it > immediately, as is my discretion as the author. Please do not withdraw the proposal (otherwise I will shamelessly resubmit it moments later) as I believe it acts as strong clarification of the way the process should work rather than adding any new policy J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-03 New Policy Proposal (Post-depletion IPv4 address recycling)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]