[address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed May 4 17:13:54 CEST 2011
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:02 +0200, Randy Bush wrote: > > If the community (as evidenced by this WG) tells the RIPE NCC not to > > implement this (or more precisely to withdraw the service they are > > already offering) then we simply open the way for private > > certification companies in the RIPE region. > > in which case, i would prefer to arrange a pro-bono one. So would I. But I can imagine going to my boss and saying "there are two alternatives for securing my address space: a pro-bono, best effort thing run by Randy or a professional one run on a commercial basis by Mega-Certicates Plc. Which would you like me to use? Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]