[address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Wed May 4 10:32:48 CEST 2011
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:46:01PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: > > Based on this feedback we (the address policy working group chairs) have > > decided to move this policy proposal to the Concluding Phase and start the > > Last Call for Comments. > > I do object to the proposal on the grounds much better described by > Malcolm Hutty and Martin Millnert than I could. > > My feeling is that we're dealing here with a possible Pandora's box, and > the implications of RPKI are not fully and widely discussed and > understood. I Think to call it a Pandora's box is to put it lightly... so I'm also against this proposal for reasons given better by Malcolm Hutty and others. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger at jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-08 (Initial Certification Policy in the RIPE NCC Service Region) going to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]