[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Tue May 3 14:04:32 CEST 2011
On 05/03/2011 01:45 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > I surely hope not, then the current policy is defective. Last I heard, > RIPE made reservation for growth when handing out first /32, so next > it'll be /31, /30 etc, up to the reserved /29. > But, PI has minimum at /48. In /32, there're 65536 /48 blocks. And costs of LIR doesn't increase so much, if he moves from /32 to /31, 30... (and similary in IPv4). Thats' the point... And probably nobody will support change in current billing policy of RIPE NCC towards higher cost of larger PA assignments (=increase it's own costs). Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]