[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Millnert
millnert at gmail.com
Sun May 1 23:06:25 CEST 2011
Hi Marcin, On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Marcin Kuczera <marcin at leon.pl> wrote: >> These /48s can be (sub-)allocated to customers (please forgive my >> flawed internet-numbers-delegation-vocabulary), who are free to >> announce them over BGP sessions. > > Indeed, however there is one "little" issue. > /32 is already advertised @AS13000 as whole. > > So there are 2 possibilities: > - add paralel route objects, but then MNT-LOWER must be added and all > related inter-ISP communiaction problems. > - not adverising /32 @ AS13000, adverising only prefixes in use. 3: - at 50 EUR/year/customer, retrieve 1 PIv6 prefix, per customer. >> Presumably, the more ISPs that sign up for this Internet tax (the LIR >> membership fees), the lower it will become (#LIRs is most definitely >> sub-linearly proportional to the RIPE NCC:s operational costs). It is >> fairly obvious to me that this attempt to (at least partially) solve a >> *perceived* network model problem with taxes is not long-term stable >> in itself.* > > You can't use this argument for people who earn around 500-1000 euro per > month with their business... > Post comunistic block is much different than old EU, and most people from > old EU do not realize that... To which I wonder, how painful is 50 EUR/year per business ("additional fees may apply"), to bring its own prefix to someone else's hosting/network infrastructure? Regards, Martin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]