[address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Fri Jul 1 13:55:46 CEST 2011
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > 20k isn't a problem, 100k isn't really a problem, potentially 5M 30 > years down the line might be a problem, 50M is most likely a problem. The problem is on prefix length over which backbone routers must take care of. 16M is not a problem if they are confined within /24. However, 5M scattered in /28 might be a problem. > The real solution is to have end systems handle session handover between > multiple addresses it has, but there seems to be pitifully little > traction for that. Yes, that is the real problem. Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]