[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Sun Dec 11 16:27:45 CET 2011
On 11/12/2011 14:25, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > maybe that would be real incentive to replace bgp with something that is > more efficient and scales better. bgp isn't the problem here. In fact, BGP is doing just fine: it scales linearly according the number of prefixes, and is staying well behind moore's law, as you can run bgp calculation engines on commodity CPU. The problem we face is dealing with lookup engines which can process ever increasing numbers of prefixes at ever faster rates. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]