[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Apr 27 08:36:00 CEST 2011
Hi, On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:10:15PM -0400, Martin Millnert wrote: > Personally I'd much prefer if the policies were aligned with reality > better, since it would allow us to get rid of the more or less > arbitrary policy-interpreting role the IPRA:s at the RIPE NCC has for > v6 resources today. This would make the landscape much more honest and > just. After all, it's just bits anyway. It's on our agenda for next week's APWG meeting, in the Thursday 11:00-12:30 time slot. (And towards Marcin: if these policies stop you from assigning /128 to end customers, that was partly the intention. Customers are supposed to receive at least a /64, or better a /56 or /48 - which is why LIRs can get a huge block of addresses quite easily. Don't return into IPv4 "single-address-plus-NAT" land!) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]