[address-policy-wg] Re: 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Fri Apr 22 20:59:40 CEST 2011
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > If someone is willing to spend a substantial amount of money per year to > hold a PI, they have a real business need and are willing to back this with > cash because it's still cheaper for them. If they don't, then please stop > using DFZ resources for no real need. So "real need" is defined as "commercial interest, backed by spending money for a database entry"? Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the cost of PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]